<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML/CSS versus Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/</link>
	<description>expert ruby on rails development</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: EZE</title>
		<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>EZE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Nice post, it cleared up some questions I had about both technologies. To Christopher: Get a life dude! You sound like a little nagging wife. Who cares if he made some grammatical errors. This is not an essay writing contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, it cleared up some questions I had about both technologies. To Christopher: Get a life dude! You sound like a little nagging wife. Who cares if he made some grammatical errors. This is not an essay writing contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>One problem I've noticed with HTML/CSS/Javascript/AJAX solutions is that I tend to have to duplicate code between the client (javascript) and server (rails).  The only way around this that I've been able to figure out is to either move all javascript code to the server side (stick it in rjs views) or do it all on the client side.  Neither approach is really feasible for what I'm working on so I end up with a mix of both and code that is not particularly DRY :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem I&#8217;ve noticed with HTML/CSS/Javascript/AJAX solutions is that I tend to have to duplicate code between the client (javascript) and server (rails).  The only way around this that I&#8217;ve been able to figure out is to either move all javascript code to the server side (stick it in rjs views) or do it all on the client side.  Neither approach is really feasible for what I&#8217;m working on so I end up with a mix of both and code that is not particularly DRY :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fouad Masoud</title>
		<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Fouad Masoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 06:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>gr8 read.
i just hit my boss with it in the face, since hes the all flash type of guy.

i couldn't agree more with ur opinions on th matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gr8 read.<br />
i just hit my boss with it in the face, since hes the all flash type of guy.</p>
<p>i couldn&#8217;t agree more with ur opinions on th matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casper Fabricius</title>
		<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Casper Fabricius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments, I appreciate it.

Coder: Glad to hear you are with me ;)

Christopher: You are right, I should spend more time proof reading. But what do you think about Flash versus HTML?

Andrew: You &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; combine RoR and Flash, in several ways even. I've tried &lt;a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/flex/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Flex&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.themidnightcoders.com/weborb/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Weborb&lt;/a&gt; out, but I think I'll go for the &lt;a href="http://www.railsontherun.com/2007/4/9/rails-and-flash" rel="nofollow"&gt;RESTful Rails&lt;/a&gt; approach next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments, I appreciate it.</p>
<p>Coder: Glad to hear you are with me ;)</p>
<p>Christopher: You are right, I should spend more time proof reading. But what do you think about Flash versus HTML?</p>
<p>Andrew: You <i>can</i> combine RoR and Flash, in several ways even. I&#8217;ve tried <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/flex/" rel="nofollow">Flex</a> and <a href="http://www.themidnightcoders.com/weborb/" rel="nofollow">Weborb</a> out, but I think I&#8217;ll go for the <a href="http://www.railsontherun.com/2007/4/9/rails-and-flash" rel="nofollow">RESTful Rails</a> approach next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  Although I'm a grammar nut, too, your small inconsistencies didn't bother me.  I'm no web guru, but I would love to be able to use the functionality of RoR with the prettiness of Flash.  I guess that's what Ajax is for, though.  That and cleaning toilets.

Thanks for the article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  Although I&#8217;m a grammar nut, too, your small inconsistencies didn&#8217;t bother me.  I&#8217;m no web guru, but I would love to be able to use the functionality of RoR with the prettiness of Flash.  I guess that&#8217;s what Ajax is for, though.  That and cleaning toilets.</p>
<p>Thanks for the article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Winslett</title>
		<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Winslett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Please run your posts through a grammar checker.  Is "Flash" plural or is it singular?

"Flash are great for games" or "Flash is not the language of the web."

On the same line: "Flash also have a few drawbacks. Most important, I think, Flash is not the language of the web."

Please write better; people will try to read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please run your posts through a grammar checker.  Is &#8220;Flash&#8221; plural or is it singular?</p>
<p>&#8220;Flash are great for games&#8221; or &#8220;Flash is not the language of the web.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the same line: &#8220;Flash also have a few drawbacks. Most important, I think, Flash is not the language of the web.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please write better; people will try to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coder</title>
		<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Coder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2007/06/28/html-versus-flash/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>XHTML &#38; CSS wins in my opinion.

I think search engine relevancy is so important today and flash doesn't help with this factor.

Nice Article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XHTML &amp; CSS wins in my opinion.</p>
<p>I think search engine relevancy is so important today and flash doesn&#8217;t help with this factor.</p>
<p>Nice Article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
