<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Rails process too slow?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/11/25/rails-process-slow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/11/25/rails-process-slow/</link>
	<description>A quiet corner of geeky posts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:15:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob S</title>
		<link>http://casperfabricius.com/site/2007/11/25/rails-process-slow/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2007/11/25/rails-process-slow/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting if you could run the numbers for Rails again once Report 12 have been in place for some while.

Report 12 in itself is a sign that the lengthy process have been recognized by the Core team and they&#039;re attempting to address it. Running the numbers again could indicate wether Report 12 is successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting if you could run the numbers for Rails again once Report 12 have been in place for some while.</p>
<p>Report 12 in itself is a sign that the lengthy process have been recognized by the Core team and they&#8217;re attempting to address it. Running the numbers again could indicate wether Report 12 is successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

